Viewing entries in
Pet Peeves

SAFe – it’s ALL about the Teams

5 Comments

SAFe – it’s ALL about the Teams

A few years ago, I promised myself that I wouldn’t write about (vent, rebut, defame, complain, rebuke, or otherwise whine about) SAFe any longer. It just frustrated me, made me an angry old curmudgeon, and significantly raised my blood pressure. And I realized that I needed to focus on more “positive” things in the agile community.

But dammit, it’s happened to me again. I’ve been SAFe’d…

Late last year I attended a meeting where a SAFe agilist and Fellow, presented a talk on finding purpose in SAFe. I’ll refer to them as Sam.

First Impressions

I don’t believe I’d met Sam before or at least not that I remembered. Sam seemed to be well-intentioned and principled. Sam was clearly a very smart and polished SAFe supporter and evangelist. And Sam also had a strong Kanban background and the lean side of that shined through the presentation.

I don’t want this to be interpreted as an opinion of Sam as a person. Instead, it’s an opinion (again) of SAFe and Sam representing SAFe as a Fellow.

5 Comments

Treating Managers Like…

Comment

Treating Managers Like…

I came across a post entitled—Stop treating managers like the bad guy, by Sander Dur. And here’s a LinkedIn thread that contains some interesting reactions to it. 

I’ve written on this topic several times as I believe there’s a significant anti-pattern in the agile universe where we treat managers poorly. Largely by the same folks who claim the managers are treating them poorly. So, reciprocal disrespectful behavior.

Here are two of those articles:

In fact, I believe this is one of the primary factors that have served to drag down agile transformations. Serving as a blaming, disrespectful, and braking function that inhibits learning, growth, and forward progress.

One of my hopes for our agile future is that—

  • Leaders & managers develop into the agile leaders we need for tomorrow’s high-performance organizations and

  • Teams meet them where they are, take responsibility for their parts, and partner to create those organizations.

Well, one can hope!

Stay agile my friends,

Bob.

Comment

You don’t understand

Comment

You don’t understand

I saw this post by Jeff Gothelf and I felt compelled to weigh in, just a little. 

First, I don’t believe Jeff needs my help. He did a great job of defending himself, his position, and his thoughts. But I didn’t want him to stand alone.

Points to be reaffirmed and made:

  • Cargo Cult agile is still alive and well in the world and we need to recognize it.

  • We need to be able to respectfully critique, debate and disagree around agile topics.

  • And there needs to be no room for personal attacks. Attack ideas, but don’t make it personal or attack people.

Wrapping Up

The agile world needs more Jeff Gothelf’s. Instead of attacking them, we should be thanking them. Thanking them for challenging the status quo, bringing in new ideas, and having the courage to be a bit disruptive.

Those are the attributes of the original Agile Manifesto folks and we need that more today than we did then.

So, stay agile and stay open-minded, my friends,

Bob.

Comment

A SAFe Interview

Comment

A SAFe Interview

My friend and colleague Mike Hall inspired me with a recent article he shared on Choosing a SAFe Training Partner.

To be clear, I was once an SPC but I fell away from being an active practitioner of SAFe. That being said, I’m often quite opinionated about it, but over time, I have less and less direct experience.

Mike is the opposite. He’s incredibly experienced with it. So, when Mike tells me something from a SAFe perspective, I know that’s not based on opinion but on hard-won experience. And I respect that.

I really appreciated his questions about engaging a SAFe training partner. But I felt there might be some additional questions to add. Not only for a training partner but for a consultant who is prescribing SAFe as the scaling solution for my organization.

Comment

Avoid Agile Silver Bullet…Thinking

Comment

Avoid Agile Silver Bullet…Thinking

What is it about technology that inspires so much silver bullet syndrome? Or people jumping on bandwagons, hoping to get an easy fix or solution?

In 2014, I wrote a blog post about Bandwagon’s. At the time, I was venting a bit about how folks were modeling themselves after companies in the agile space. And that continues to this day. But another long-term trend is jumping on bandwagon’s related to frameworks.

Scaling frameworks seem to be one of the largest culprits in our space, but there are many others. Let’s explore some of the biggest silver bullets—

Comment

CoP and the LACE

Comment

CoP and the LACE

SAFe LACE Alert

In my last post, I shared some ideas around the value of a Community of Practice and how to re-energize it if it’s lost a bit of momentum. Please read that one if you haven’t before reading on here.

Now I want to contrast things a bit between CoP’s and CoE’s. Specifically of the LACE kind… 

Contrasting between a CoP and a Center of Excellence?

There’s another notion you’ll often hear when discussing this area. It’s a Center of Excellence or CoE. My bias is going to shine through a bit here, but please bear with me.

A CoE is a more formal, top-down mechanism whose primary goal is the consistency of practice. That is, it’s focused on regulation and governance. Often metrics and agile performance metrics are tied to it as well. A good example of this idea is the Scaled Agile Framework’s – Lean-Agile Center of Excellence or LACE[1]. And you can also see the idea often marketed or aligned with the Agile PMO or PMI’s Disciplined Agile[2].

I’ve already alluded to the two problems I have with generic CoE’s. First is the prescriptive top-down nature—where the organization tries to mandate practices. I think that’s a non-starter in agile contexts and particularly not aligned with the agile mindset. So, implementing a CoE can actually do harm to your culture you’re trying to instill or support.

The second is that it disengages from the people doing the work. Which are the very people who are part of the “community” you’re trying to create. Typically, the teams and individuals only engage with the CoE because they’re told to. Not because they’re inspired to or are invited to participate.

In my opinion, you don’t create an agile culture by top-down mandate. It’s just doesn’t work. Instead, the organic nature of building a community of practitioners aligns so much better with our agile mindsets.

And the third challenge with creating a balanced and effective CoE relates to the agile maturity of the leadership team. If they’ve not evolved to an agile mindset, across leadership, then the CoE often becomes a mechanism for reinforcing controls and measurement.

All of these lead to problems if your goal is to truly develop and mature as an agile organization. So, approach LACE and all Centers of Excellence with caution and care.

 Stay agile my friends,

Bob.

 

 



[1] https://www.scaledagileframework.com/lace/

[2] https://www.pmi.org/disciplined-agile/people/centers-of-excellence

Comment

Lost Art of Asking for Help

Comment

Lost Art of Asking for Help

I’ve been involved in agile for ~20 years and I’ve noticed a consistent anti-pattern that never seems to change.

People wait too long to ask for help!

I’ve noticed it in my coaching. By the time I usually get called into a situation where an organization is attempting to implement agile is, dare I say it, things are off the rails. Sure, a part of me thinks that’s a good or normal thing. But that’s the revenue generation part of me.

The principled agile coach part of me always wishes that they had reached out earlier. That it would have saved so much aggravation and frustration, wasted time & effort, and ultimately cost.

But it’s not just as a coach. It also applies to my leadership experience too.

If a project was off-track or a commitment would be missed, I usually found out at the last minute. Far later than when I could have actually helped or done something. I always work hard as a leader to create safety for bad news, to be approachable, and to be grateful for it. Very hard. But it still shocked me how often folks wait too long to share something with me. I often wonder, what did I have to do to create the culture where sharing challenges was rewarded, was the norm, and not feared?

Comment

The Hammer and the Pickle

Comment

The Hammer and the Pickle

I’m not sure everyone is aware of some of the greats who have come before us but there have been many in our software development space. One of them is Gerald Weinberg.

When I think of Jerry, I think of the phrase—standing on the shoulders of giants. His writing has had a profound impact on me and many others in our software and agile communities. If you haven’t heard of him, I’d encourage you to become more familiar with his timeless advice and wisdom. I believe I’ve heard him say he’d written ~100 books, so there’s a lot of wisdom available. Sadly, Jerry passed away in 2018.

https://geraldmweinberg.com/

https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/08/jerry-weinberg-passed-away/

A bit of Weinberg

I want to amplify two of Jerry’s Secrets of Consulting principles in this post:

First, there is—

The Law of the Hammer: “the child who receives a hammer for Christmas will discover that everything needs pounding.”

And second, there is—

Prescott’s Pickle Principle: “Cucumbers get more pickled than brine gets cucumbered.”

I want to bring both of these principles into the world of Agile Coaching. I know, I know what could hammers and pickles have to do with coaching? Well, let’s see…

Comment

The Lost Art of Face-to-Face Communication

1 Comment

The Lost Art of Face-to-Face Communication

I was chatting with a friend the other day about his frustrations in having a solid conversation with one of his colleagues. 

It seemed he has very specific ideas around making a product decision. One that would disrupt the status quo a bit, but in his mind, was the absolute right decision. He had sent several emails to the decision-maker and they’d just kept putting them/him off.

I’d asked if he’d called them and he looked at me as if I was crazy. He was like…

  • They don’t often answer their phone as they’re busy, so that doesn’t work;

  • They don’t like to talk face-to-face and, frankly, neither do I;

  • Why can’t they just make a decision in my favor and respond in email? Oh, and taking appropriate action?

We left it that he should call them or, better yet, Zoom them with both cameras on. I felt that he was missing an important aspect of human connection. In fact, he wasn’t “connecting”. He was lobbing ideas out into email without any emotional or physical connection.

I’d like to share a communication list with you. On the top, are more effective ways to communicate. And, as you go down the scale, your communication increasingly loses its effectiveness and connection—

PLUS - Rich Conversation / Connection

  • Face-to-face, in-person (outside office)

  • Face-to-face, in-person (in office)

  • Face-to-face, virtually with both cameras ON

 NEUTRAL - Ok Conversation / Connection

  • Virtually, cameras off

  • Phone call

  • Slack threads

  • Email

MINUS - Terrible Conversation / Connection 

  • Texts, other forms of chat

  • Slack

  • Legal correspondence

  • Telegraph/Morse Code, Smoke signals, Pony express

Wrapping Up

I’d like to encourage all of us, particularly in these challenging Covid-19 times, to not lose the art of face-to-face communication. That is, talking to each other.

I mean…really talking!

Let the passion, body language, expressiveness, and emotion shine through. Ask questions in real-time. And actively listen to the other person. I mean…really, deeply listen!

See what happens. You might just regain the lost art of face-to-face communication that Dinosaurs like me have historically found to be quite valuable.

Now if I could just find a payphone…

Stay agile my friends,

Bob.

1 Comment